ANSARI, A., KOENIGSBERG, O. and
STAHL, F., 2011. Modeling Multiple Relationships in Social Networks. Journal of
Marketing Research, 48 (4), pp. 713-728.
Firms have been using social networks more and more to
market different products. This could be a reason why firms keep putting effort
into researching and looking into the future of these networks. They also try
to predict the level of interactivity and the factors affecting customers. The
models in this journal explore the reasons behind customer relationships and
the structural characteristics of both multiplex and sequential networks.
ALEXY, O. and REITZIG M., 2012. Managing the Business
Risks of Open Innovation. McKinsey Quarterly, 1, pp. 17-21.
This article explores the risks that can be associated
with innovation. Whenever companies are in an open, intellectual-property-free
space, they are in a situation called: open competition, which always
has several risks for the company. If a firm is really against risks then it
will most likely be against innovation as well as the two usually go hand in
hand. The ‘safest’ one company can be in a very competitive and innovative
environment is when it specializes on a product or on a product range with similar
features.
KIM, S. and MCKERCHER, B., 2011. The Collective Effect of
National Culture and Tourist Culture on Tourist Behaviour. Journal of Travel
& Tourism Marketing, 28 (2), pp. 145-164.
Cross-cultural understanding is greatly researched
all across this field, but in spite of all the money and time going into cross-cultural
training programs, research still suggests that miscommunication still exists
between the host and the guest cultures. This fact is usually visible because of
the expected behaviour differs from the actual one, meaning that there is a gap
between theory and practice. This article explores this gap, saying that
tourists behave differently in other countries than at home, forming a so
called ‘tourist culture’. Therefore, their
behaviour when they are abroad are a mixture of their own (usual) behaviour
mixed with the native one. These findings should have an impact on
cross-cultural training.
BAJS, I., 2011.
Attributes of Tourist Destination as Determinants of Tourist Perceived Value.
International Journal of Management Cases, 13 (3), pp. 547-554.
All companies, products and services have a whole lot of
different attributes a customer can evaluate, so it is interesting to know that
customers actually only evaluate a couple of these. This is one of the main
reasons why we should be able to tell why customers choose which attribute.
This could be hard as not only every situation is different, but not all
customers think in the same way as well. So this is why finding characteristics
that a set group of customers prefer could be just the competitive advantage
the company needs. A customer’s perception is intangible and hard to define so
it is extremely important to conduct a qualitative research, for the best
results possible. When looking at tourist destination, the main research
question when evaluating them was: why do they prefer this destination over the
other?
Ei kommentteja:
Lähetä kommentti